Pengembangan Model Prediktif Pendeteksi Financial Fraud Berdasarkan Fraud Model Theory

Putri Andini; Anava Nesia Santoso; Kezia Yokbeth Wilhelmina Danomira; Martdian Ratna Sari; Noveri Maulana

doi:10.34149/jmbr.v20i3.583

Pengembangan Model Prediktif Pendeteksi Financial Fraud Berdasarkan Fraud Model Theory

Putri Andini - Program Studi Sarjana Akuntansi Bisnis, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM, DKI Jakarta
Anava Santoso - Program Studi Sarjana Akuntansi Bisnis, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM, DKI Jakarta
Kezia Yokbeth Danomira - Program Studi Sarjana Akuntansi Bisnis, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM, DKI Jakarta
Martdian Sari - PPM School of Management , & Program Studi Sarjana Akuntansi Bisnis, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM, DKI Jakarta , &
Noveri Maulana - Program Studi Sarjana Manajemen Bisnis, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM, DKI Jakarta

Abstract

Financial fraud is among the rarest forms, resulting in the greatest organizational losses. Financial and reputational crises are examples of the costs of financial manipulation. In detecting fraud, much research has been carried out regarding the factors driving fraud from the financial aspect. Therefore, this research fills the gap related to the lack of fraud detection by combining financial and non-financial aspects and the absence of a fraud detection model that effectively proves that fraud has occurred. This research uses a quantitative approach using company annual report data for 2018-2022. Analysis was carried out using multiple regression. The results of this research show that Return on Assets (ROA), Debt Equity Ratio (DER), Organizational Ownership (OSHIP), reduction in receivables, earnings growth, and e-procurement are capable of being factors in detecting organizations committing fraud. Based on the results of this research, organizations are expected to be able to implement good systems and controls to prevent fraud, such as maintaining stability, reducing dependence on debt, ensuring appropriate share ownership by insiders, limiting the amount of income from receivables, and implementing a good e-procurement system for reducing the risk of fraud. The results of this research can also help companies develop strategies to detect and prevent financial statement fraud. However, this research is limited to the same industry, namely the pharmaceutical industry.

Keywords

Fraudulent Financial Statement; Fraud Detection Factor; Fraud Detection Model

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to The Nations. Jakarta: ACFE.

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I.D. (2022). Hexagon fraud: detection of fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013

Alfarago, D., & Mabrur, A. (2022, June 24). Do fraud hexagon components promote fraud in Indonesia? Etikonomi, 21(2), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v21i2.24653

Aviantara, R. (2021). The association between fraud hexagon and government’s fraudulent financial report. Asian Pacific Fraud Journal, 6(1), 26–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v6i1.192

Bawakes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M. A., & Daat, S. C. (2018). Pengujian teori fraud pentagon terhadap fraudulent financial reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Daerah, 13(1), 114-134. https://doi.org/10.52062/jakd.v13i1.1429

Citra, A., Lindrianasari, Syaipudin, U., Dharma, F., & Metalia, M. (2022). Fraud detection of financial statements through the fraud hexagon approach in Indonesian SOEs. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 22(22), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2022/v22i2230709

CNBC Indonesia. (2021). Deretan skandal lapkeu di pasar saham RI, Indofarma-Hanson! CNBC Indonesia. Retrieved April 7, 2023 from cnbcindonesia.com

Direktorat Jenderal Bea Cukai. (2020). Apa yang dimaksud dengan korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme? Bojonegoro: KPPBC tipe Madya Pabean C Bojonegoro. Retrieved April 10th, 2023 from https://bcbojonegoro.beacukai.go.id/ufaqs/apa-yang-dimaksud-dengan-korupsi-kolusi-dan-nepotisme

Francesco, I., & Hastuti (2022). The effect of e-procurement implementation and government internal control system against fraud prevention of government procurement of goods/services (survey of procurement officials in Cimahi City). Indonesian Accounting Research Journal, 2(3), 237–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.35313/iarj.v2i3.4126

Gio, U.P. (2015). Belajar olah data dengan EViews. Medan: USU Press.

Godfrey, Jayne., et al. (2010). Accounting theory. 7th Edition. Australia: John Wiley & Sons.

Haqq, A. P. N.A., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2020). Analisa teori fraud pentagon sebagai pendeteksi kecurangan pada laporan keuangan. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 22(3). https://akt.febi.uin-alauddin.ac.id/assets/file/AKPM-6440-_camerafullpaper.pdf?1626845429

Herdiyanto, D.G., & Ardiyanto, M.D. (2015). Pengaruh tax avoidance terhadap nilai perusahaan. Diponegoro of Journal Accounting, 4(1), 274-283. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/16817

Huang, S. Y., Lin, C. C., Chiu, A. A., & Yen, D. C. (2017). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(6), 1343–1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9

Katadata.co.id. (2022). Kolusi adalah kerja sama dalam hal buruk, ini pengertiannya. Retrieved April 5th, 2023 from https://katadata.co.id/intan/berita

Khamainy, A. H., Ali, M., & Setiawan, M. A. (2022). Detecting financial statement fraud through new fraud diamond model: The case of Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 925–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2021-0118

Maulidiana, S., & Triandi, T. (2020). Analysis of fraudulent financial reporting through the fraud pentagon theory. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 143, 214-219. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v7i1.4036

Menteri Keuangan. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 17/PMK.01/2008 tentang “Jasa Akuntan Publik”. Jakarta: Kemenkeu RI

Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., Prawitt, & Douglas F. (2008). Auditing dan assurance services: A systematic approach 6th edition. Boston: MCGraw-Hill.

Mohamed, N., & Handley-Schachler, M. (2015). Roots of responsibilities to financial statement fraud control. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01080-1

Nakashima, M. (2021). Can the fraud triangle explain fraudulent financial statements? Evidence from Japan. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 13(1), 198-232. https://s3.amazonaws.com/web.nacva.com/JFIA/Issues/JFIA-2021-No1-12.pdf

Nanda, S. T., Zenita, R., & Salmiah, N. (2019). Fraudulent financial reporting: A fraud pentagon analysis. GATR Accounting and Finance Review, 4(4), 106–113. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3528327

Ngadiman, & Puspitasari, C. (2014). Pengaruh leverage, kepemilikan institusional, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap penghindaran pajak (tax avoidance) pada perusahaan sektor manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2010-2012. Jurnal Akuntansi, 18(3), 408-421. http://journal.tarumanagara.ac.id/index.php/jakt/article/view/2163

Nihayah, A.Z. (2019). Pengolahan data penelitian menggunakan software SPSS 23.0. Semarang: UIN Walisongo Semarang.

Nuryadi, et al. (2017) Dasar-dasar statistik penelitian. Yogyakarta: Universitas Mercu Buana.

Paiman. (2019). Teknik analisis korelasi dan regresi ilmu-ilmu pertanian. Yogyakarta: UPY Press.

Premananda, N. L. P., Budiartha, I. K., Bambang Suprasto, H., & Nyoman Badera, I. D. (2019). Fraud diamond analysis in detecting fraudulent financial reporting (study on Indonesian Capital Market). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 47(2), 84-95. https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/10176/0

Puspitha, M. Y., & Yasa, G.W. (2018). Fraud pentagon analysis in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 42(5), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v6i1.14646

PwC. (2022). PwC’s global economic crime and fraud survey 2022. London: PricewaterhouseCoopers. Retrieved April 5th, 2023 from www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/forensics/economic-crime-survey.html.

Rahman, A., Negeri, P., Jl, M., & Almamater, N. (2020). detection of financial statement fraud triangle (fraud triangle) in LQ45 companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Technical Vocational and Engineering Technology, 2(1). http://www.journal.pktm.org/index.php/ijtvet/article/view/23

Rahman, M. J., & Jie, X. (2022). Fraud detection using fraud triangle theory: evidence from China. Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2022-0219

Rahmayuni, Sri. (2018). Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2013-2016). Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Padang, 6(1), 1-20. https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/akt/article/view/2951/2177

Ratnasari, M., & Rofi, M. A. (2020). Faktor-faktor yang memotivasi kecurangan laporan keuangan. Journal of Management and Business Review, 17(1),79-107. https://doi.org/10.34149/jmbr.v17i1.202

Santosa, S., & Ginting, J. (2019). Evaluasi keakuratan model beneish m-score sebagai alat deteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan. (kasus perusahaan pada Otoritas Jasa Keuangan di Indonesia). Majalah Ilmiah Bijak, 16(2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.31334/bijak.v16i2.508

Schuchter, A., & Levi, M. (2016). The fraud triangle revisited. Security Journal, 29(2), 107-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.1

Sekaran, Uma. (2017). Research method for business (7th Edition). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Sihombing, T., & Cahyadi, C.C. (2021). The effect of fraud diamond on fraudulent financial statement in asia pacific companies. Ultimaccounting Journal Ilmu Akuntansi, 13(1), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v13i1.2031

Situngkir, N.C., & Triyanto, D.N. (2020). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting using fraud score model and fraud pentagon theory: Empirical study of companies listed in the L.Q. 45 Index. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 23(3), 373-410. http://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.486

Spicer, C. (2022). The implications of fraud on non-shareholder stakeholders. Thesis. Scholar Commons: Senior Theses, 574.

Sujana, E., Putra, N., & Wahyuni, M.A. (2019). Testing of fraud diamond theory based on local wisdom on fraud behavior. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 69(1), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.2991/teams-18.2019.3

Supriyanto, S., Tay, M.L., Chairika, S., & Maria, S. (2022). Manajemen risiko kecurangan pada perusahaan perbankan di Indonesia. Sibatik Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan, 2(1), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v2i1.535

Ulum, M.H. (2018). Buku statistik. Malang: STIKes Widya Cipta Husada.

Umar, H., Partahi, D., & Purba, R. (2020). Fraud diamond analysis in detecting fraudulent financial report. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(3), 6638-6646. http://dx.doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v9i2.1632

Vousinas, G.L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128

Wicaksono, A., & Suryandari, D. (2022). The analysis of fraudulent financial reports through fraud hexagon on public mining companies. Accounting Analysis Journal, 10(3), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v10i3.54999

Widana, I.W., & Muliani, P.L. (2020). Uji persyaratan analisis. Lumajang: Klik Media.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2546&context=facpubs

Yadiati, W., Rezwiandhari, A., & Ramdany. (2023). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned company: hexagon theory approach. JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 10(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v10i1.5676

Yanti, D. D., & Munari, M. (2021). Analisis fraud pentagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan pada sektor perusahaan manufaktur. Akuisisi: Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.24127/akuisisi.v17i1.578.g401

Zimbelman, Mark F. (2014). Akuntansi forensik: Forensic accounting (ed.4). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34149/jmbr.v20i3.583

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{jmbr583,
    	author = {Putri Andini and Anava Santoso and Kezia Yokbeth Danomira and Martdian Sari and Noveri Maulana},
    	title = {Pengembangan Model Prediktif Pendeteksi Financial Fraud Berdasarkan Fraud Model Theory},
    	journal = {Journal of Management and Business Review},
    	volume = {20},
    	number = {3},
    	year = {2023},
    	keywords = {Fraudulent Financial Statement; Fraud Detection Factor; Fraud Detection Model},
    	abstract = {Financial fraud is among the rarest forms, resulting in the greatest organizational losses. Financial and reputational crises are examples of the costs of financial manipulation. In detecting fraud, much research has been carried out regarding the factors driving fraud from the financial aspect. Therefore, this research fills the gap related to the lack of fraud detection by combining financial and non-financial aspects and the absence of a fraud detection model that effectively proves that fraud has occurred. This research uses a quantitative approach using company annual report data for 2018-2022. Analysis was carried out using multiple regression. The results of this research show that Return on Assets (ROA), Debt Equity Ratio (DER), Organizational Ownership (OSHIP), reduction in receivables, earnings growth, and e-procurement are capable of being factors in detecting organizations committing fraud. Based on the results of this research, organizations are expected to be able to implement good systems and controls to prevent fraud, such as maintaining stability, reducing dependence on debt, ensuring appropriate share ownership by insiders, limiting the amount of income from receivables, and implementing a good e-procurement system for reducing the risk of fraud. The results of this research can also help companies develop strategies to detect and prevent financial statement fraud. However, this research is limited to the same industry, namely the pharmaceutical industry.},
        	issn = {2503-0736},    	pages = {502--519},    	doi = {10.34149/jmbr.v20i3.583},
        	url = {https://jmbr.ppm-school.ac.id/index.php/jmbr/article/view/583}
    }