Ridho Ryswaldi, Vera Pujani



Penelitian ini dilakukan bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat atau ketertarikan generasi milenial terhadap purchase decision involvement yang dimediasi oleh trust. Variabel independent pada penelitian ini ada social media usage, eWOM, third party recognition, dan legal framework. Teknik pengumpulan sampel dilakukan dengan non probability sampling dengan purposive sampling. Generasi milenial pada penelitian ini memiliki rentang umur 18-34 tahun. Responden merupakan mahasiswa S1 dan S2 di Kota Padang. Jumlah responden pada penelitian ini sebanyak 216 responden. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Maximum Likelihood. Pada penelitian ini diperoleh social media usage, eWOM, dan legal framework berpengaruh signifikan positif terhadap purchase decision involvement, sementara third party recognition tidak berpengaruh. Untuk mediasi oleh trust, social media usage, eWOM, third party recognitiom, dan legal framework, berpengaruh terhadap purchase decision involvement.


This research was conducted aiming to find out the factors that influence interests of millennial generation towards purchase decision involvement mediated by trust. The independent variable in this study is social media usage, eWOM, third party recognition, and legal framework. The sample collection technique is done by non probability sampling with purposive sampling. Millennial generation in this study has an age range of 18-34 years. Respondents are undergraduate and graduate students in the city of Padang. The number of respondents in this study were 216 respondents. The data analysis technique used in this study was Maximum Likelihood. In this study obtained social media usage, eWOM, and legal framework have a significant positive effect on purchase decision involvement, while third party recognition has no effect. For mediation by trusts, social media usage, eWOM, third party recognitiom, and legal framework, affect purchase decision involvement



social media usage, eWOM, third party recognitiom, legal framework, trust, purchase decision involvement


Bojang, I. (2017). Determinants of Trust in B2C e-commerce and their relationship with consumer online trust : A case of ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 22(May).

Bollen, K. . (1989). Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2006). Understanding Consumer Trust in Internet Shopping : A Multidisciplinary Approach, 57(4), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi

Chinomona, R., & Pooe, D. (2013). The Impact of Product Quality on Perceived Value , Trust and Students ’ Intention to Purchase Electronic Gadgets, 4(14), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n14p463

Cook, D. P. (2003). The Role of Third-Party Seals in Building Trust Online, 2(3), 71–84.

Doorn, J. Van, Mittal, V., & Nass, S. (2010). Customer Engagement Behavior : Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions Customer Engagement Behavior : Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions, (August). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375599

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping : an integrate mode, 27(1), 51–90.

Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gura˘u, C. (2012). A life-stage analysis of consumer loyalty profile : comparing Generation X and Millennial consumers, 29(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211206357

Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (Seventh Ed). Harlow: Pearson New International Edition.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073

Houston, M. J. (2016). A Paradigm for Research on Consumer Involvement, (June).

Jalilvand, M. R., & Samiei, N. (2012). The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and purchase intention An empirical study in the automobile. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501211231946

Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Vitale, M. R. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet Store Consumer trust in an Internet store ∗. https://doi.org/10.1023/A

Jin, D., Gon, W., & Soo, J. (2007). A perceptual mapping of online travel agencies and preference attributes, 28, 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.022

Kamal, F. F. (1999). Cyber Business (ed 3). Jakarta: Alex Media Komputindo.

Koufaris, M., & Hampton-sosa, W. (2004). The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers, 41, 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.004

Krishnamurthy, S., & Dou, W. (2008). Note from Special Issue Editors, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2008.10722137

Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001). A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping, (May).

Ma, L., Sun, B., & Kekre, S. (2015). The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease — An Empirical Analysis of Customer Voice and Firm Intervention on Twitter, (September).

Mcknight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce : An Integrative Typology, 334–359.

Meskaran, F., Ismail, Z., & Shanmugam, B. (2013). Online Purchase Intention : Effects of Trust and Security Perception, 7(6), 307–315.

Mittal, B. (1989). Measuring Purchase-Decision Involvement, 147–162.

Parment, A. (2013). Generation Y vs . Baby Boomers : Shopping behavior , buyer involvement and implications for retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.001

Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust, 15(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.

Purnasari, H., & Yuliando, H. (2015). How Relationship Quality on Customer Commitment Influences Positive e-WOM, 3, 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.01.029

Raman, A. (2015). Web Services and e-Shopping Decisions : A Study on Malaysian e-Consumer Web Services and e-Shopping Decisions : A Study on Malaysian e-Consumer, (December).

Ray, I., Ray, I., & Natarajan, N. (2005). An anonymous and failure resilient fair-exchange e-commerce protocol, 39, 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2003.10.011

Salam, A. F., Rao, H. R., & Pegels, C. C. (2003). Consumer-Perceived Risk in E-Commerce Transactions, 46(12), 325–332.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach (Seventh Ed). New York: Wiley.

Sofie, Y. (2003). Consumer Protection and its Legal Instruments,. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Stewart, K. J. (2001). Trust Transfer on the World Wide Web, (June).

Surekha, D. (2010). Consumers Awareness about Rights and Grievance Redressal. India.

Tuteja, G. (2016). Consumer Trust in Internet Shopping : An Empirical Investigation, 53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971890716670723

Wahyuni, E. S. (2003). Aspect of Certificate and its Connection to Consumer Protection. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

wu, P. C. s., & Wang, Y. C. (2011). The influences of electronic word-of-mouth message appeal and message source credibility on brand attitude. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 448–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851111165020

Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.016

You, Y., Vadakkepatt, G. G., & Joshi, A. M. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Elasticity. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0169

Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G., & Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter ? A study of consumer product reviews ☆. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34149/jmbr.v17i1.168

JMBR Editorial Office: PPM School of Management, Jl. Menteng Raya 9-19 Jakarta 10340 Phone: 021-2300313 ext 2354

 View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.