Counterparty Credit Limit: Identifikasi, Pengukuran dan Pemetaan Risiko Bank-Bank di Indonesia

Saur Costanius Simamora

Abstract


This study aims to carry out risk management planning, identification, qualitative analysis and quantitative risk calculations, establishing counterparty credit limits on banks in Indonesia. The risk identification process utilize 59 expert views from the field of financial institution banks in Indonesia. Subsequently the qualitative analysis stage employ the two dimension rating schemes method, namely probability and impact. Each included risk is measured in the Low, Medium and High category. The identification process resulted in 18 risks that are facing banks in Indonesia. From that risks, the quantitative analysis using Probability - Impact dimension shows that in the Low - Medium quadrant there is 1 risk. In the Medium - Medium quadrant there are 3 risks. In the Medium-High quadrant there are 8 risks. While the High - High quadrant resulted in 6 risks. The Delphi method output from the probability dimension, indicates the risk of error in analyzing the counterparty's financial performance (balance sheet analysis, cashflow, income statement, financial ratio) and not monitoring and recognizing sanctions or legal cases that occur to counterparties give a value of 2.29. While from the Impact dimension, the risk of error in analyzing the counterparty's financial performance (balance analysis, R / L report, financial ratio) give a value of 2.78. All of these results, the experts have reached convergence or consensus.

Keywords


Credit Risk; Expert Opinion; Rating Schemes; Counterparty Limits; Delphi Method

References


Departemen Penelitian dan Pengaturan Perbankan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2015). Penyempurnaan Kerangka Counterparty Credit Risk Basel II Dan III. Jakarta.

Departemen Penelitian dan Pengaturan Perbankan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). Pendekatan Standar Untuk Counterparty Credit Risk (Sa-Ccr). Jakarta.

Djohanputro, Bramantyo. (2008). Manajemen Risiko Korporat. Penerbit PPM. Jakarta.

Herfini, Emmawati., dan Jogiyanto, Hartono. (2013). Analisis Penilaian Counterparty Credit Risk Untuk Kebijakan Penetapan Credit Line Kepada Bank-Bank Koresponden Di Negara Eropa oleh PT. Bank ABC (Persero), Tbk Pada Masa Krisis Ekonomi Eropa (Tesis). Yogyakarta (ID): Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Ikatan Bankir Indonesia (IBI) dan Banker Association for Risk Management (BARa). (2015). Manajemen Risiko 1. Modul Sertifikasi Manajemen Risiko Tingkat 1. Jakarta.

Kasmir. (2016). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan lainnya. Ed. Revisi Cet.17. Rajawali pers. Jakarta

Kurniawati., Theresia LI., Saputra, Mochamad Chandra., dan Rachmadi, Aditya. (2018). Identifikasi dan Analisis Kualitatif Risiko Sistem E-Budgeting dan E-Procurement Studi Kasus: Administrasi Pembangunan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 2, no. 11, p. 4940-4948, juli 2018. ISSN 2548-964X. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.

Pritchard, Carl L. (2015). Risk Management Concepts and Guidance Fifth Edition. United States: PMI Book Service Center.

Rum, I.A dan Ratni H. (2018). Modul Metode Delphi. Universitas Padjajaran. Direktorat Jasa Keuangan dan BUMN, Bappenas.

Subagyo, Ahmad, Rusli Simanjuntak dan Alexander Irianto Bukit. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Risiko. Edisi Pertama. Mitra Wacana Media. Jakarta.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998

Wiryani., Helen., Achsani, Noer Azam., dan Baga, Lukman M. (2013). Pemetaan Risiko di Industri Penyamakan Kulit dengan Pendekatan Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, Vol. 10 No. 1 Maret 2013: Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34149/jmbr.v18i2.274

JMBR Editorial Office: PPM School of Management, Jl. Menteng Raya 9-19 Jakarta 10340 Phone: 021-2300313 ext 2354

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.